EMS medical director reviewing clinical evidence with paramedic educators

Medical Director

You cannot review every PCR. GAGE shows you where to look.

Prioritize high-risk cases, inspect the supporting evidence, direct remediation and measure whether clinical performance improves over time.

Chart to trendClinical context
Candidate reviewHuman determination
QA to trainingClosed-loop learning
Data brought together
ePCR & clinicalCAD & dispatchTraining & LMSProvider rosterPolicies & protocolsOutcome data when available

Purpose-built capability

A focused workspace for Medical Director

Designed around actionable exceptions, visible evidence, role boundaries and accountable follow-through.

01

12-lead and STEMI QA

Review acquisition timing, repeat ECG patterns, activation volume, transmission timing and interpretation themes when source data supports them.

  • Delayed acquisition candidates
  • Activation review
  • Provider trends
  • Education referral
02

Sepsis and infection

Surface suspected cases, screening gaps, structured physiologic indicators and intervention or destination patterns.

  • Screen completion
  • Missed-screen candidates
  • Perfusion and temperature context
  • Cluster cross-link
03

Trauma quality

Find destination, scene-time and high-risk documentation exceptions for authorized clinical review.

  • Triage candidates
  • Destination compliance
  • Anticoagulant flags
  • Mechanism and physiology trends
04

Airway and respiratory

Track attempts, first-pass success, rescue devices, capnography and post-airway reassessment.

  • Difficult-airway queue
  • Attempt sequence
  • Confirmation evidence
  • Provider and device trends
05

Cardiac arrest review

Assemble arrest classification, ROSC, defibrillation, medication, airway and disposition evidence into a conference-ready case view.

  • Shock sequence
  • Medication timing
  • Airway review
  • Case packets
06

Medication and high-risk care

Review narcotics, discrepancies, refusals, AMA, paediatric, obstetric and other low-frequency/high-risk encounters.

  • Documentation completeness
  • Pattern detection
  • Human disposition
  • Targeted follow-up

Product interface

Narrative review pairs the source text with prioritized, explainable findings.

Focused role views bring source evidence, operational context and action together without forcing teams to interpret disconnected reports.

GAGE
Narrative review showing prioritized findings

Clinical oversight

Prioritize by risk, not by whichever chart arrived first.

Illustrative GAGE workspace
18High-risk reviews
6Protocol themes
4Education referrals
91%Follow-up closed
Priority workspaceOwner · Status · Evidence

Potential delayed 12-lead — review evidence

Review

Difficult airway — conference packet ready

Open

High-risk refusal — reviewer assigned

Review

Repeat documentation theme — training referral

Open
01 Evidence stays attached to the signal.02 The accountable role sees the action it owns.03 Status and closure remain visible across departments.

Why it stands apart

Decision support with the clinical authority left intact.

Automated analytics identify review candidates and assemble evidence. The Medical Director or authorized reviewer makes the clinical determination.

  • Explainable flags
  • Trend over one-call judgement
  • Case-to-training connection
  • Audit-ready review history

Coming Soon

The next capabilities for this workspace

These integration-dependent and longer-horizon functions will be released after their source data, controls and validation are ready.

On the horizon

Advanced reviewer calibration

Inter-rater agreement, blind review and calibration workflows for agencies operating mature multi-reviewer clinical QA programs.

Build a clearer operating picture

See how GAGE can connect and analyze the data your agency already produces across its operational systems.

Request a demo